The optimal timing of hepatitis C therapy in liver transplant-eligible patients: Cost-effectiveness analysis of new opportunities.

Different strategies of DAAs treatment are currently possible both pre- and postliver transplantation (LT). Clinical and economic consequences of these strategies still need to be adequately investigated; this study aims at assessing their cost-effectiveness. A decision analytical model was created to simulate the progression of HCV-infected patients listed for decompensated cirrhosis (DCC) or for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Three DAAs treatment strategies were compared: (i) a 12-week course of DAAs prior to transplantation (PRE-LT), (ii) a 4-week course of DAAs starting at the time of transplantation (PERI-LT) and (iii) a 12-week course of DAAs administered at disease recurrence (POST-LT). The population was substratified according to HCC presence and, in those without HCC, according to the MELD score at listing. Data on DAAs effectiveness were estimated using a cohort of patients still followed by 11 transplant centres of the European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association and by data available in the literature. In this study, PRE-LT treatment strategy was dominant for DCC patients with MELD<16 and cost-effective for those with MELD16-20, while POST-LT strategy emerged as cost-effective for DCC patients with MELD>20 and for those with HCC. Sensitivity analyses confirmed PRE-LT as the cost-effective strategy for patients with MELD≤20. In conclusion, PRE-LT treatment is cost-effective for patients with MELD≤20 without HCC, while treatments after LT are cost-effective in cirrhotic patients with MELD>20 and in those with HCC. It is worth reminding, though, that the final choice of a specific regimen at the patient level will have to be personalized based on clinical, social and transplant-related factors.

Immune tolerance induction in patients with haemophilia a and inhibitors: effectiveness and cost analysis in an European Cohort (The ITER Study).

INTRODUCTION: Although immune tolerance induction (ITI) is considered the first choice treatment to eradicate inhibitors in haemophilia A patients, little is known about outcomes determinants and cost magnitude. AIM AND METHODS: A retrospective, multicentre study was conducted to assess the relationship between ITI outcome, clinical and treatment characteristics and cost of ITI treatment in haemophilia A patients. Data from 12 months before inhibitor diagnosis to 12 months after ITI completion were collected. Treatment cost was calculated in the third-party perspective and expressed as mean € per patient-month. Cox regression models were used to identify predictors of better outcome and the time taken to achieve tolerance. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients, aged 0.4-41 years (median: 3.8 years) at ITI start, were enrolled. Undetectable inhibitor was achieved in 84.5% of patients and inhibitor eradication with normal factor VIII (FVIII) pharmacokinetics in 74.2%. Median time to successful tolerance was 10.7 months (range 2.0-90.0 months). Peak inhibitor level on ITI was a significant predictor of ITI success. Breakthrough bleeding event incidence during ITI was associated with time to success. The mean cost of treatment for the time period between inhibitor diagnosis and ITI start was €3188 per patient-month (92.1% for bypassing agents), and €60 078 during ITI (76.8% for FVIII use in ITI). CONCLUSION: Immune tolerance induction in this patient cohort was successful in 84.5% of patients with a mean cost of €60 000 per patient-month. This high cost is dwarfed by comparison with the prospect of lifelong care of an inhibitor patient, in addition to gains in life expectancy and health-related quality of life.

Cost-Effectiveness of New Direct-Acting Antivirals to Prevent Post-Liver Transplant Recurrent Hepatitis.

Preliminary studies on HCV-cirrhotics listed for transplant suggest that sofosbuvir in combination with ribavirin is very effective in promoting viral clearance and preventing disease recurrence. Unfortunately, the high cost of such treatment (€46 500 per 12 weeks of treatment) makes its cost-effectiveness questionable. A semi-Markov model was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of sofosbuvir/ribavirin treatment in cirrhotic patients without HCC (HCV-CIRRH) and with HCC (HCV-HCC) listed for transplant. In the base-case analysis, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for 24 weeks of sofosbuvir/ribavirin was €44 875 per quality-adjusted life-year gained in HCV-CIRRH and €60 380 in HCV-HCC patients. Both results were above the willingness to pay threshold of €37 000 per quality-adjusted life-year. Our data also show that in order to remain cost-effective (with a 24-week treatment), any novel interferon-free treatment endowed with ideal efficacy should cost less than €67 224 or €95 712 in HCV-cirrhotics with and without HCC, respectively. The results shows that sofosbuvir/ribavirin therapy, given to patients listed for transplant, is not cost-effective at current prices despite being very effective, and new, more effective treatments will have little economic margins to remain cost-effective. New interferon-free combinations have the potential to revolutionize the treatment and prognosis of HCV-positive patients listed for transplant; however, without sustainable prices, this revolution is unlikely to happen.

Clinical epidemiology of hand eczema in patients accessing dermatological reference centres: results from Italy.

BACKGROUND: Data on the epidemiological impact and clinical characteristics of chronic hand eczema in Southern Europe are lacking. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of chronic hand eczema in its different stages of severity and refractoriness to standard therapy in patients accessing Italian dermatological reference centres, and to evaluate sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with each stage. METHODS: A cross-sectional multicentre study was conducted. Adult patients with hand eczema, consecutively accessing 14 centres over a 6-month period, were enrolled. Patients were classified according to disease duration, severity and response to standard therapy with potent topical corticosteroids. Logistical regression was performed to investigate the relationship between sociodemographic and clinical data with different stages of eczema. RESULTS: The total number of participants was 981. Hand eczema was chronic in 83·5% of patients; 21·3% had severe eczema, with 62·0% of these patients refractory to standard therapy. Food processing and related work, the health professions, craft and related trade works (building, plumbing, electrical), hairdressing/beauty and handicraft work were most frequently associated with chronic hand eczema. Severe chronic hand eczema was more likely to be seen in men, older patients and those with less education. Severe and refractory hand eczema was also more likely among the unemployed and patients with allergic rhinitis and/or atopic dermatitis. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic hand eczema is frequent among patients with hand eczema accessing dermatology centres. Many patients were severe and refractory to standard therapy. The appropriate identification of hand eczema is the first step in implementing effective and efficient treatments.

Management of treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 patients: a cost-effectiveness analysis of treatment options.

New and more promising therapies for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) genotype 1 (G1) naive patients have recently been approved in the United States and Europe, and several more regimens are expected to become available within the next several years. While this scenario unfolds, it is necessary to develop a rational method to allocate current treatment in CHC G1 patients. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of boceprevir (BOC)- and telaprevir (TVR)-based triple therapy according to different patients' selection strategies. A semi-Markov model of CHC natural history and progression towards end-stage liver disease was built. We considered 3 selection strategies based on METAVIR fibrosis stage: (i) treat all patients with F1-F4 fibrosis, (ii) only F2-F4 and (iii) only F3-F4. For each strategy, TVR interleukin-28B-guided (IL28B-guided) and BOC rapid virologic response-guided (RVR-guided) therapies were applied. The model assessed the costs and outcomes, using a lifetime and 5-year time horizon, and adopting the Italian National Health System perspective. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for F1-F4 strategy relative to F3-F4 was €5132 per quality-adjusted life years gained, across TVR IL-28B-guided therapy, and €7042 in the BOC RVR-guided therapy. Conversely, in the 5-year scenario, the ICER for F1-F4 strategy relative to F3-F4 was €1 818 679 (TVR IL28B-guided) and €1 866 437 (BOC RVR-guided) per end-stage liver disease or death (ESLD-D) avoided. In view of anticipated improvement in the efficacy of future regimens, selective treatment of only patients with advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis with TVR or BOC could represent the most cost-effective strategy to optimize resource utilization.

Health-related quality of life in patients with haemophilia and inhibitors on prophylaxis with anti-inhibitor complex concentrate: results from the Pro-FEIBA study.

Patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors are at high risk for severe bleeding, progression of joint disease and deterioration of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). To determine the impact of prophylaxis with an activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) on HRQoL, HRQoL was assessed using the Short-Form (SF)-36 Health Survey and the EQ-5D questionnaire in subjects ≥ 14 years participating in a prospective, randomized, crossover study comparing 6 months of aPCC prophylaxis with 6 months of on-demand therapy. Eighteen of 19 patients completed the survey or questionnaire before and after the on-demand therapy and prophylaxis periods. A general trend towards improved HRQoL after prophylaxis was observed for the 18 evaluable patients in all SF-36 dimensions except for vitality/energy and physical functioning. After prophylaxis, 'good responders,' defined as patients experiencing ≥ 50% reduction in bleeding, exhibited statistically and clinically significant differences in the physical component score (P = 0.021), role - physical (P = 0.042), bodily pain (P = 0.015), and social functioning (P = 0.036). Similarly, the EQ-5D health profile showed a trend towards improvement after prophylaxis in all evaluable patients. Among the good responders, improvements did not differ from those observed after on-demand treatment. EQ visual analogue scale values were slightly improved following prophylaxis for all evaluable patients and the EQ-5D utility index improved in the good responders only. During prophylaxis, patients missed significantly fewer days from school or work because of bleeding than during on-demand treatment (P = 0.01). In conclusion, by significantly reducing bleeding frequency in good responders, aPCC prophylaxis improved HRQoL compared with on-demand treatment.

Use of health-related quality-of-life measurements to estimate individuals' health on screening.

OBJECTIVES: to investigate the utility of assessing Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in a large group of subjects participating in a screening program for aneurysm and the relationship between HRQoL, diagnosis of aneurysm and related risk factors. METHODS: subjects involved in this screening program were submitted the EQ-5D questionnaire to report their own HRQoL. HRQoL was reported also a second time by the subjects who were diagnosed with aneurysm during screening and who returned for a monitoring follow up visit a few months later. We evaluated compliance with HRQoL data collection and performed multiple regression analyses in order to investigate the possible relationship between demographic and clinical data with HRQoL. RESULTS: 1,633 subjects screened (6.1% diagnosed with aneurysm) and 125 subjects diagnosed with aneurysm and attending a follow-up visit reported their HRQoL. Completion of the EQ-5D questionnaire was well accepted by both physicians and subjects undergoing screening. HRQoL was not significantly different between the screening and followup visits, on adjusting for age and sex. At the screening visit, HRQoL was associated with ASA class, heart condition, BMI and respiratory diseases. No associations were found at the follow-up visit. CONCLUSION: Assessing HRQoL in screening programs is feasible and well accepted and add useful information on health of large numbers of subjects from general population. This could be considered as a routine approach to optimizing the informative role of screening programs in guiding other investigations or interventions.